
Radicalisation – Rebellion in Extreme Form
Although radicalisation is stereotypically associated with certain groups, it can affect almost everyone. Since extremism contributes to the destruction of the …
Reading Time: mins
Last updated on August 18, 2026
Have you ever noticed a number, symbol, graffiti, or phrase online and wondered what it really meant? Could a simple username, tattoo, image, or meme carry a hidden ideological message? How can we recognise the signs of radicalisation before words turn into actions?
Every day we encounter thousands of images, symbols and other visual messages. In most cases, we don’t stop to consider their meanings or possible underlying significance. While most are harmless, some may serve as coded messages that promote extremist ideologies or support recruitment into radical groups. Learning to recognise such signs is becoming an increasingly important part of prevention and efforts to strengthen societal resilience. This article aims to help readers identify and interpret expressions, symbols, and signs that may be linked to radicalisation.
To strengthen resilience against radicalisation in Poland and across Europe, the Polish Platform for Homeland Security (PPHS) actively participates in international PCVE initiatives and knowledge-sharing projects. Within this framework, the organisation engaged in the Erasmus+ training course focused on radicalisation prevention, organised by Alternativi International in Bansko, Bulgaria (4–12 May 2026). Drawing directly on that experience, this article supports the broader mission of raising awareness of current and emerging threats, including extremism, at both local and international levels.
Before jumping straight into extremist symbols, we need to briefly clarify what radicalisation actually entails. At its core, radicalisation is a complex process through which individuals adopt extreme ideologies—whether political, nationalist, or religious—that justify violence or ideologically motivated crime, a threat increasingly amplified today by online platforms.
Crucially, radicalisation rarely happens in a vacuum. It is shaped by a combination of personal vulnerabilities, social isolation, identity crises, and perceived injustices. Understanding these underlying factors and what drives individuals toward extreme narratives is essential for developing effective prevention strategies based on early intervention and resilience.
There are several signs that may indicate a risk of radicalisation. These can include embracing conspiracy theories, withdrawing from family and friends, expressing feelings of persecution, showing intolerance towards different opinions, or refusing to engage with alternative points of view. Some outward signs may be visible and easy to notice, while others can be more subtle or obscure.
However, radicalisation is not only reflected in behavioural changes. Coded language, such as symbols, signs, slogans, numbers can also play an important role in spreading extremist narratives. They can be used both online and offline to communicate a particular group affiliation, strengthen group identity, and, as a result, promote extremist values. In some contexts, such symbols and language help create an alternative reality in which violence is normalised, justified, or presented as necessary in order to achieve certain goals.
Spotting these early warning signs is particularly vital for frontline professionals working with young people and vulnerable groups, including educators, youth workers, law enforcement, and prison staff. Whether in community spaces, online platforms, or correctional facilities, detecting subtle linguistic and visual cues enables professionals to intervene before potential threats escalate.
Symbols, codes, or behavioural shifts should never be viewed as definitive indicators of radicalisation on their own. Their true meaning depends entirely on context—including personal intent, surrounding content, and broader circumstances. Awareness is not about making assumptions or unfairly labelling individuals; it is about carefully interpreting warning signs to support timely, early intervention. European prevention frameworks consistently emphasise that no single indicator stands alone, and any observation must be guided by contextual understanding and professional judgement.
To make things more practical, we invite you to test yourself. Below is a short quiz presenting selected symbols, numbers and expressions that may be linked to extremist narratives. They are widely used in radical or extremist environments, and may appear in the form of tattoos, usernames on social media, graffiti, or other visual materials. Before reading the explanations, try to guess what each symbol, number or expression might mean or represent.
So, how did you do? Whether you recognised most of the symbols or found a few surprising ones, testing your knowledge is a practical step towards building real-world awareness. However, spotting codes and signs is only effective when combined with proper context, professional judgement, and early intervention strategies.
Translating this awareness into effective prevention requires structured training, international cooperation, and shared expertise. This is precisely the focus of initiatives like the Erasmus+ training course in Bansko and the ongoing security efforts led by the Polish Platform for Homeland Security.
To translate theory into practice, we joined the Erasmus+ training course “Preventing Youth Radicalisation in the Digital Age: Tools for Youth Workers” in Bansko, Bulgaria. Bringing together 23 participants from 11 countries, the initiative provided a dynamic space for international dialogue and practical skill-building. Using non-formal education methods—including real-world case studies, scenario simulations, and interactive workshops—participants examined the drivers of digital radicalisation, early warning signs, and prevention strategies across diverse European social contexts.
A key takeaway from these activities is that recognising symbols and online narratives is only one part of effective prevention. Sustainable prevention also requires evidence-based practices, local risk assessments and continuous support for frontline practitioners—an approach that is reflected in PPHS’s wider work.
As an active partner of the EU Knowledge Hub on Prevention of Radicalisation (EUKH), we bridge European research with practical, on-the-ground implementation. By collaborating with policymakers, researchers, and field experts, we contribute to systemic efforts that strengthen societal resilience in Poland and across Europe. Learn more about the EU Knowledge Hub on Prevention of Radicalisation.
Stay updated on emerging security threats, new educational resources, and upcoming PCVE initiatives. Subscribe to the PPHS Newsletter to receive our latest insights and project updates directly in your inbox and follow us on LinkedIn to join the professional discussion and track our international cooperation efforts.
Anti-Defamation League. (2019). Hate on Display™: Hate symbols database.
European Commission (2026). Prevention of radicalisation. Directorate-General for Migration and Home Affairs.
EU Knowledge Hub on Prevention of Radicalisation
European Commission. Directorate-General for Migration and Home Affairs. (2024). The root causes of violent extremism.
Educate Against Hate. Radicalisation and extremism.
Centre for Information Resilience. (2025). Use of coded language by far-right extremists online: Emojis, numbers, and symbols reinforce in-group identity.
European Parliament. (2021). Radicalisation in the EU: What is it? How can it be prevented?
Prislan, K., Černigoj, A., & Lobnikar, B. (2018). Preventing radicalisation in the Western Balkans: The role of the police using a multi-stakeholder approach. Journal of Criminal Investigation and Criminology, 69(4), 257–268.
Kuczyński, P. (Ed.). (2023). The virus of radicalization. Collegium Civitas.
Mazurczak, J. (2020). Radykalizacja jako proces prowadzący do ekstremizmu i terroryzmu. Miscellanea Anthropologica et Sociologica, 21(2), 45–73.
Lamphere-Englund, G., White, J., & Global Network on Extremism and Technology. (2023). The online gaming ecosystem: Assessing digital socialisation, extremism risks and harms mitigation efforts. Global Network on Extremism and Technology.
EUROPOL. Project COMPASS A project dedicated to fighting against The Com, (2025).
EUROPOL. European Union Terrorism Situation and Trend report 2025 (EU TE-SAT).
EUROPOL. European Union Terrorism Situation and Trend Report 2026.
EUROPOL. Project COMPASS. A project dedicated to fighting against The Com, (2025).
ADL. Backgrounder. QAnon (2022).


While the concept of evaluation, particularly evidence-based evaluation, has gained attention and been widely promoted, its uptake and implementation remain pro…

Radicalisation is an extremely complex phenomenon, therefore, understanding and preventing it requires interdisciplinary knowledge and advanced tools. Developin…

Although radicalisation is stereotypically associated with certain groups, it can affect almost everyone. Since extremism contributes to the destruction of the …

